Why the housing sector should keep an eye on Trump's push to end Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorship

Today’s letter is brought to you by Epum!

ResiClub has a new data partnership with Epum, a real estate research lab which is focused on tracking commercial real estate projects—including single-family rental and built-to-rent—in planning or under construction nationwide.

Epum’s platform is the definitive resource for tracking, visualizing, and analyzing parcel-level site plan approvals, rezonings, and special exceptions for new housing or other CRE projects in planning.

All ResiClub readers are welcome to use the ResiClub discount code (ResiClub22025), to receive 10% off when subscribing to Epum.

You can watch Epum’s product demo here.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorship by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) in September 2008 after suffering massive losses during the housing crash, threatening the stability of the U.S. financial system. The U.S. Treasury provided a bailout to keep them afloat, and they have remained under government control ever since—despite returning to profitability.

While the U.S. Treasury owns the majority of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits through senior preferred stock agreements, the common and preferred shares that existed before conservatorship were never fully wiped out. Once Wall Street realized Donald Trump had won the 2024 election, the stocks of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac spiked as the market priced in higher odds that the second Trump administration would attempt to end that conservatorship. After all, one of Trump’s biggest backers this cycle was Bill Ackman, a leading proponent of releasing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from conservatorship.

The odds of conservatorship ending—or at the very least, an attempt to unwind it—increased this week after Trump posted on social media: “I’m giving very serious consideration to bringing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public.” Then, on Thursday evening, Bill Pulte, the director of FHFA, tweeted out a podcast he did with Donald Trump Jr. centered on the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Those aren’t the kind of public moves the administration would make unless it is seriously considering a push to end conservatorship or wants to further test financial market reaction to the idea.

The 800-pound gorilla: What would this do to mortgage rates?

The reason housing stakeholders should pay attention is the long standing concern that ending conservatorship could put upward pressure on mortgage rates.

See, once released, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could need to hold more capital to absorb losses. To build and maintain that capital, they may need to increase guarantee fees charged to lenders. In addition, upon release, unless there's an “explicit guarantee” or backstop from Congress, investors may demand higher returns to account for increased risk.

Those concerns are real enough that back in February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae wouldn’t get released from conservatorship if doing so put upward pressure on mortgage rates/mortgage spreads.

“The priority for a Fannie and Freddie release, the most important metric that I’m looking at is any study or hint that mortgage rates would go up. Anything that is done around a safe and sound release [of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] is going to hinge on the effect of long-term mortgage rates,” Bessent said in February.

On Friday, Bessent reaffirmed in an interview with Bloomberg that the privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hinges on mortgage rates, saying: “It [privatization of Fannie and Freddie] is a goal for this administration. Again, we're doing peace deals, tax deals, and trade deals. As we land some of those deals then we will focus on that [privatization of Fannie and Freddie]. But what I can tell you is that we are doing a great deal of studying at Treasury because the one requirement for this privatization is that they are privatized in such a way that mortgage spreads do not widen.”

To understand how mortgage rates could respond in different Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae release scenarios, ResiClub PRO members (paid tier) should read this housing research article we published back in February.

Are you a real estate investor? Do you own rental property? 🏠

If so, you’re invited to participate in the Stessa-ResiClub Real Estate Investor Survey.

The survey results will be published soon after in ResiClub—and in other major media publications.

Existing home sales remain constrained

Monthly U.S. existing home sales totaled 349,000 in April 2025.

That's -28% below the 448,000 existing home sales we've averaged for April since 2000.

U.S. existing-home sales were running at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) of 4.00 million in April 2025. Meaning IF we maintained the current existing-home sales pace, and seasonality acted as expected, we'd do 4.00 million existing home sales over the next 12 months.